Experts Call On Government To Ban Tackling In School Rugby

The UK and Irish governments are being warned that they should do more to protect school children from injury, including head trauma, while playing rugby.

As the Six Nations continues, over 70 academics, doctors and public health professionals have sent an open letter to Ministers, Chief Medical Officers and Children’s commissioners to request a ban of the collision elements of rugby within British school systems, so that children play touch and non-contact rugby.

They write: “Rugby is a high-impact collision sport. Studies show that the risks of injuries for those aged under 18 years are high and injuries are often serious. Second, many secondary schools in the United Kingdom deliver contact rugby as a compulsory part of the physical education curriculum from age eleven. Third, the majority of all injuries occur during contact or collision, such as the tackle and the scrum. These injuries which include fractures, ligamentous tears, dislocated shoulders, spinal injuries and head injuries can have short-term, life-long, and life-ending consequences for children.”

Evidence shows that there is a 28 per cent risk of injury for a child rugby player over a season of 15 games. The risk of concussion for a child or adolescent rugby union player over a season is 11 per cent - that is the equivalent of one or two players sustaining a concussion every season in every school or club rugby team of 15 players. Research also points to the tackle being a particular cause for concern. In youth rugby, tackles were found to be responsible for up to two thirds (64 per cent) of all injuries and 87 per cent of concussions. Meanwhile, rugby union is being taken into 750 state secondary schools with the aim of reaching one million children.

One of the signatories of the open letter is Professor Allyson Pollock from Queen Mary University of London and author of the book Tackling Rugby - What every parent should know about injuries which summarises the current state of evidence on the topic. She said: “Parents expect the state to look after their children when they are at school. Rugby is a high-impact collision sport and given that children are more susceptible to injuries such as concussion, the absence of injury surveillance systems and primary prevention strategies is worrying. Children are being left exposed to serious and catastrophic risk of injury. “As a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the UK and Irish governments should ensure the safety of rugby, by removing the contact from the children’s game in schools.”

Another signatory, Professor Eric Anderson, from the University of Winchester and author of 21st Century Jocks, said: “Our contention is not with Rugby, there are many positive things that come from this team sport; our contention is with the collisions that occur in rugby. School children should not be forced to collide with other children as part of the National Curriculum for Physical Education. A more sensible approach is to play tag rugby.”

Open Letter to SoS DCMS 9th Feb 2021 FINAL.pdf Open Letter to SoS DCMS 9th Feb 2021 FINAL.pdf
Size : 208.291 Kb
Type : pdf
Open Letter to CMOs 18th Dec.pdf Open Letter to CMOs 18th Dec.pdf
Size : 196.751 Kb
Type : pdf
Open Letter SportCIC March7 2016.pdf Open Letter SportCIC March7 2016.pdf
Size : 135.154 Kb
Type : pdf

Responses to the SportCIC open letter

Edward Timpson Response.pdf Edward Timpson Response.pdf
Size : 545.167 Kb
Type : pdf
Response John Dowd Response John Dowd
Size : 166.563 Kb
Type : unknown
Jamie Hepburn Response Jamie Hepburn Response
Size : 370.688 Kb
Type : unknown
Response Huw Lewis Response Huw Lewis
Size : 206.563 Kb
Type : unknown
Ombudsman for Children.pdf Ombudsman for Children.pdf
Size : 835.638 Kb
Type : pdf
RCPCH statement on rugby 02 March 2016.pdf RCPCH statement on rugby 02 March 2016.pdf
Size : 600.72 Kb
Type : pdf
FSEM statement on rugby 03 March 2016.pdf FSEM statement on rugby 03 March 2016.pdf
Size : 657.926 Kb
Type : pdf
SallyHolland Response.pdf SallyHolland Response.pdf
Size : 105.706 Kb
Type : pdf
"Protect children, remove contact"